WiFi Map (or, Fuel to a Fire)
WiFi Map is the most exciting thing I've seen in DeWi in over a year
What if I told you there was a DeWi project with 4M MAUs (monthly active users), 150M+ downloads over eight years, and a real, working product so good that it was rated 4.6/5 by >2M people? You’d laugh right? So would I, until today.
It’s rare that your entire perspective on an industry changes in a single day, especially if you’ve been in said industry for years. WiFi Map provided this perspective shift for me and I’m looking forward to to keeping up with their progress and helping the team however I can.
The use of token incentives to drive desired real-world actions is the entire premise of the emerging DePIN (decentralized physical infrastructure network) vertical of crypto. The most successful projects in this space will be those with the lowest barriers to entry for contributors (time, hardware costs, difficulty of earnings) and the most valuable benefits to users (many project-specific use cases like more/better car data with DIMO, DIY cellular coverage/cheaper connectivity with Helium, energy bill rebates with React).
After all, it’s hard enough to build both sides of a marketplace at once, which is what most DePIN projects are trying to do. You can liken this effort to being alone, hungry, and cold in a dark forest with only a can of gasoline and trying to start a fire. Many DePIN projects in the bear market of 2023 are rummaging around for twigs (supply), rubbing them together trying to create a spark (demand), and then dumping their can of gasoline (token incentives) wherever they see a flame.
Wouldn’t it be easier to add a crypto component as fuel to an already roaring fire?WiFi Map plans to do just that and their token is launching March 30th, 2023.
Past and Present
WiFi Map has been around since 2014 as a “community-driven wireless network and self-funded startup.” It was co-founded by Denis Sklyarov (CEO) and Igor Goldenberg (CTO) and has since grown to ~30 team members worldwide. Denis and Igor previously worked together at Kenlo Group, an award-winning software development firm for mobile apps.
Over the past 8 years, WiFi Map has built a robust, two-sided economy around wireless connectivity, privacy, and travel. They’ve motivated 13M contributors to map >100M WiFi hotspots with their in-app “points” system that allows for tipping and discounted in-app purchases. The end result of this “DeWi without the token” approach is that they’ve served 150M users in 200+ countries around the world.
What does “serving users” look like here? The company provides a global map of WiFi hotspots (available offline with download), in-app eSIM plans for cellular connectivity when WiFi is unavailable, VPN services, and a speed test.
WiFi Maps’ core offering is connectivity, just like the other DeWi networks we’re aware of today (Helium, XNET, WiFi Dabba, etc). However, they’re approaching the challenge of connectivity from a completely different angle. Instead of incentivizing participants to deploy wireless hardware to build a new network, they’re utilizing existing infrastructure (public/private WiFi hotspots, local cell towers) and simply improving access to it.
It’s undeniable that there is a positive flywheel here. More app downloads means more contributors and users. More contributors = more WiFi hotspots mapped, increasing the value of the app and therefore its user base (hello network effects). More users means that the app has a greater captive audience for advertisements and a greater chance to facilitate meaningful amounts of economic activity (Pro subscriptions to the app, third-party services like eSIM connectivity and a VPN). This increases the likelihood that additional third-party services and integrations are added (see their recent portable power bank partnership with Chargefon), increasing the app’s value to users and contributors and again driving downloads.
One way to look at the scalability of a company is to ask yourself, “Does this get better as it gets bigger, and if so, how?” The ratio between LTV (lifetime value of a customer)/CAC (the cost to acquire that customer) is a helpful way to quantify this question. If the LTV/CAC ratio for a network/product/service increases over time, this means it “gets better as it gets bigger.” Taking the above flywheel example, more downloads should increase LTV as the surface area for in-app economic activity grows with the number of contributors, users, and monetization opportunities. Concurrently, CAC likely decreases with more downloads as the potential for word-of-mouth referrals grows exponentially (especially when an app is growing quickly and organically as is the case here). To my knowledge, WiFi Map hasn’t even needed to spend on marketing or ads as their product is just that good and their non-token “point” system has been incentive enough to drive contributions globally. It will be interesting to analyze the team’s use of their upcoming token (which behaviors are incentivized and to what extent) in the context of CAC, but as long as they’re thoughtful and conservative with its use as an incentive, this likely only increases the speed with which the WiFi Map flywheel turns.
More UI screenshots below:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74b0d/74b0d0782b2e78dfc83fcf20fce20d2382bc09d3" alt=""
Monetization: today and tomorrow
WiFi Map currently does about $650k of in-app ARR (may be understated as data.ai sometimes misses a portion of in-app transactions). With their upcoming private and public token sales, they’re looking to significantly increase this number via a few channels:
Additional paid subscriptions
WiFi Map has three paid subscription plans (in addition to their core, free product).
Napkin math: There’s lots of nuance around monthly vs. annual payment discounts and different plan choices, but I’m going to keep the math simple here and just assume all paid users are at the highest tier. The reality is likely a larger number of users total due to some users paying for cheaper plans. Assuming that their $650k ARR is mostly attributable to paid “Pro+VPN” plans, they have about 18,500 paid users on this plan. Math: $650k/$35 “Pro+VPN” plan annual cost = 18,571 paid users of that plan.
WiFi Maps’ estimated in-app subscription ARR (with no user growth) = $650k. WiFi Maps’ estimated in-app subscription ARR (with 10x user growth) = $6.5M.
Paid, in-app advertising from local restaurants, shops, and venues
Advertisers could pay to stand out on the map or be highlighted on the local business “list.” To my knowledge, WiFi Map currently isn’t monetizing this way but plans to do so in the future.
Napkin math: Google was the world’s largest ad seller by revenue in 2022. Google Search’s median CPM across 1.5B ad impressions and 42M clicks in Q2 2019 (best data I could find) was ~$40. CPM means cost per mille and is short for “cost per thousand views.” WiFi Maps’ 4M MAUs/1000 = 4000 “milles.” 4,000 “milles” times $40 cost per mille = $160,000 in ad revenue monthly.
WiFi Maps’ estimated in-app advertising ARR (with no user growth) = $1.92M. WiFi Maps’ estimated in-app advertising ARR (with 10x user growth) = $19.2M.
Lead generation for hospitality/travel companies
This monetization channel is less concrete and is likely executed on a longer time horizon with larger, multi-national brands. For example, in-app Uber or Marriott bookings will likely allowed “for free” by WiFi Map due to the convenience such an integration would provide app users (especially if WIFI token holders/paid plan members receive discounts). I’d think WiFi Map would just charge a % commission on leads generated in-app rather than up-front advertising fees here. From a quick search, commission %’s range from ~10%-17% for hotels, car/scooter rentals, tour operators, etc. If WiFi Map uses a commission structure, the math is as follows:
Napkin math: Start with 4M MAUs. Assume 10% spend $10 a month with third-party services (Uber, Lime scooters, hotel bookings) in app. 400k MAUs times $120 in-app third-party service spend per year times 10% commission = $4.8M in commission ARR.
WiFi Maps’ estimated in-app commission ARR (with no user growth) = $4.8M. WiFi Maps’ estimated in-app commission ARR (with 10x user growth) = $48M.
Other avenues for monetization
Anything beyond the above three examples is either speculation or non-public info, but the monetization opportunities for a large (and growing) engaged user base in a high-spend category like travel are nearly limitless (especially with the introduction of the WIFI token and the additional exchanges of value it makes possible in-app).
Monetization summary
WiFi Maps’ estimated potential ARR with no user growth = $7.37M.
WiFi Maps’ estimated potential ARR with 10x user growth = $73.7M.
Not bad for a network valuing itself today at $12.5M / $25M FDV (private sale vs. public sale).
Why implement a token?
The WIFI token will replace in-app “points” as a store of value, unit of account, and medium of exchange (“money”). The WIFI token will have real value outside of the app (can be sold on exchanges once listed) unlike the “points” that are currently used today. Moving from a points system to a token system should add a liquidity premium to the token’s intrinsic value and allow for the possibility of a speculative premium as well (a freely traded token can also have its price pushed below intrinsic value however).
WIFI will be distributed to incentivize desired behaviors (mapping additional WiFi hotspots, refreshing old ones, etc.) and spent to acquire desired services (GBs of data, VPN protection, scooter/car rentals, hotel bookings, etc). I believe the team will also allow for fiat spend in-app and then convert the requisite amount of WIFI on the backend.
In a novel implementation of DeWi token utility, users lock WIFI when they buy a data plan. Any unused data can be refunded into the appropriate amount of WIFI tokens, which are then unlocked from the data plan smart contract.
WIFI holders will also be able to lock up and stake their tokens to earn small amounts of data and/or additional WIFI. I’m not sure as to the motivation for this besides decreasing circulating supply (and potentially sell pressure), but it seems the team will pay these rewards via cheap data bought in bulk and token emissions.
Things to look out for
Tokenomics and token value accrual
The WiFi Map whitepaper mentions that “10% of all funds collected from redeemed WIFI will flow to a DAO, where the community can decide on how to manage these funds.” The “funds collected from redeemed WIFI” wording should capture all revenue generated by the app and network, as WIFI is always what ends up being redeemed for goods/services on the network (even if fiat-denominated demand is converted to WIFI on the backend by the core development team first).
More importantly however, what about the other 90% of revenue? Where’s that going? Investors in the token sale (both private and public) are investing in the token and therefore network, not the equity of the core development team or the entity itself that started this all. This is a welcome departure from the traditional “equity investment with token warrants” model that has often left community contributors frustrated as they watch parent company equity valuations soar while leaving token (and network) valuations in the dust. While I believe the team and investors are financially incentivized to accrue value to the token and network (13% and ~9% of token supply, respectively), this is something to be aware of when considering how value flows through this project and how much of it does (or doesn’t) currently accrue to the token itself.
Look out for additional confirmation of this via legal obligations and/or smart contracts, as well as more information about the other 90% of revenue. Given that the team is raising into the token/network (and not parent company equity), my hypothesis is that they are preserving the 90% of revenue accrual for the parent company to self-fund until such time as they believe in the token model enough to drive significantly more (maybe all) revenue into the token itself.
Governance
As with any community-built network, governance is important. Given that there are far lower barriers to entry here for contributors in terms of time/money/effort spent (vs. a network like Helium or Hivemapper), contributors might not deserve the same amount of governance power but will likely still want some say in how the network is run (even if this is just a community forum). Given the team’s success at motivating millions of contributors over nearly a decade, I believe they’ll listen for and respond to feedback quickly from those who are building the app alongside them every day.
Look out for official/unofficial channels for community feedback and engagement such as regularly scheduled community meetings, some sort of WIP implementation (WiFi Improvement Proposals), or other forms of progress towards governance that are inclusive of the community’s opinions.
TGE (token generation event) info
WIFI supply and distribution
1B total WIFI tokens roughly distributed as follows:
31.5% to ecosystem rewards & development
20% to the treasury
18% to team and advisors
13% to private and public investors
10% for liquidity provision on exchanges and in-app
7.5% for marketing
In March, WiFi Map will be conducting a private sale of up to 8.83% of the network for investors at a price of $0.0125 per WIFI, raising ~$1.1M.
On March 30th, they’ll be conducting a public sale of up to 4.17% of the network at a price of $0.025 per WIFI, raising another ~$1M.
Proceeds will be used to expand the team, add features and services in-app, and “pursue strategic acquisitions when deemed optimal.” Remember, they’ve been bootstrapped for 8 years, so they’re likely raising as little as possible (who wants more dilution than necessary)?
Bottom line
WiFi Map is the most excited I’ve been about DeWi in over a year. I’m glad to see a (currently Web2) community-built connectivity and travel app find value in a tokenized (Web3) model and decide to enter the industry in a meaningful way.
I’m bullish on the trend of successful Web2 companies thoughtfully integrating a token to catalyze growth and establish their own mini-economy (especially in DePIN and especially in a bear market). The WiFi Map team seems to be doing just that and will push our space to new heights in 2023.
Moving forward
Moving forward, I’ll be writing about happenings in DeWi, DePIN (decentralized physical infrastructure networks), and my own life as they come up.
Click the subscribe button below to stay up to date (it’s free)!
Disclaimer : As of the date of this publication, Connor Lovely (“Connor”) may hold long, short, or neutral positions in or related to the companies or digital assets described herein. The information in this publication was prepared by Connor, is believed by Connor to be reliable, and has been obtained from public sources believed to be reliable. Connor makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Opinions, estimates and projections in this publication constitute the current judgment of Connor and are subject to change without notice. Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained in this publication are necessarily speculative in nature and are based upon certain assumptions. It can be expected that some or all of such assumptions will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, any projections are only estimates and actual results will differ and may vary substantially from the projections or estimates shown. This publication is not intended as a recommendation to purchase or sell any commodity or security. Connor has no obligation to update, modify or amend this publication or to otherwise notify a reader hereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, project on, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. Following publication, Connor may transact in any digital asset or the securities of any company described herein. This publication is not an offer to sell securities of any investment fund or a solicitation of offers to buy any such securities. An investment in any strategy, including the strategy described herein, involves a high degree of risk. There is no guarantee that the investment objective will be achieved. Past performance of these strategies is not necessarily indicative of future results. There is the possibility of loss and all investment involves risk including the loss of principal.